Scientists
have made a new discovery that could change a lot of things for chocolate
lovers. Dark chocolate may be healthier to eat than milk chocolate. This could
be a huge step up in offering an alternative to the addicting milk chocolate
that can be harmful to your health when consuming large amounts. What makes
dark chocolate healthier?
Well, Faculty
of Life Sciences (LIFE) at the University of Copenhagen found that dark
chocolate is much more filling than milk chocolate. This would cause people to
crave salty, sweet, and other fatty foods much less. They think that consuming
a reasonable amount of dark chocolate over the holidays could help keep your
weight down.
A study
was done with 16 young men to test this theory. Half of the men were tested
eating dark chocolate, and half with milk chocolate. Each consumed an equal
amount (100g) of their given chocolate within a given time. They were asked to
record their hunger throughout the next few hours. They were then offered pizza
and instructed to eat enough to satisfy themselves. After measuring each man’s
calorie intake, the scientists’ hypothesis was proven correct. The men that had
consumed dark chocolate had consumed about 15 percent less calories than
those that had consumed milk chocolate.
Dirk
Taubert, MD, PhD, and colleagues at the University of Cologne in Germany found
that dark chocolate also helps lower blood pressure, but only when combined
with a healthy and well-balanced diet. Mauro Serafini, PhD, of Italy's National
Institute for Food and Nutrition Research also finds that there are helpful
antioxidants in dark chocolate that prevent certain molecules that cause heart
disease.
I don’t
know about you, but I think these are some pretty big factors that can be
caused by making a small change in one’s diet. I have a big sweet tooth and next
time I eat chocolate, I might take a step back and consider the alternative of
eating dark chocolate to improve my health.
Word Count: 331
http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20030827/dark-chocolate-is-healthy-chocolate
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081210091039.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment